The Geocentric Debate Continues
I [Michael Baran, Brockton, Masschussetts] would like to submit “another ether perspective” as a possible solution, suggested by ether-theory, to the theoretical problem raised by Gerry Vassilatos in “Eidetic Geocentrism.”
He asked, why don’t we “feel” earth’s rotational angular displacement in space? He argues that our not sensing this appears to be a key inconsistency of quantitative inertial theory.
His analysis is based on standard quantum concepts. Standard quantum theory holds that quantum-order-particle forces are determinative in the universe. In this standard cosmology, optically-visible quantum light forces are considered to be a central parameter of both universal forces and human sensations in general.
But what if the actual, elemental, determinative forces of the universe, and the forces mediated and sensed in Nature, are much more rarefied, etheric, and yet-undefined?
In a universal-ether model, our atoms would ultimately comprise etheric units, or etherons. Quantum-order particles and quantum forces like the photon particle of visible light would be merely one more (from a deterministic viewpoint, unimportant) gradational aggregative particle composed of much-more-rarefied etheric particles. There would exist a dynamic continuum between the energic ether of material bodies like humans and the earth, and the contiguous ether of space. How a succession of ether-gradients interact would constitute the actual deterministic schema – not our visual-interpretive processes.
In this schema, our bodies are ultimately made of simple energic etherons possessing (like the known larger energy units) spin and magnetic polarity, and they would be capable of resonating, via wave effects in the ether, in an elemental, pure, way, with other etheric (determinative, universal) forces. The etherons comprising our bodies would resonate most strongly, by far, with each other, because of their close proximity. That would be how we keep our atomic and physical structure. But they also would resonate partially with outside etheric (“auric”) forces. These external forces are not nearly as strong as their mutual resonance within their body, but of the outside forces, earth’s forces would be overwhelmingly the greatest. In this schema, our elemental etheric external-spatial orientation is entirely toward earth. Forces from
space would be vastly more distant and insignificant compared to earth’s.
So our spatial-displacement orientation would be overwhelmingly toward earth; with respect to outer space, would constitute a macrocosmic-scale step-down-gradient. In terms of our elemental sensations, earth’s movements in space would not be felt at all by us.
Gerry’s Vassilatto’s Reply
Ether, as defined by Late Victorian Science, was nothing more than a gaseous and permeating atmosphere. Though dynamic and possessed of exceptionally great mean free velocities, ether gas was not considered a formative force by any means. Therefore, I discount all quantum interpretations of reality completely, seeing that these are based primarily on gas dynamic concepts. Reality, perception, and experience therefore rely on far deeper fundamentals which permeate even the etheric atmosphere.
What I have found corroborates the discoveries and definitions of the early Victorian Science which was entirely qualitative in scope and method. This qualitative approach empowered investigators with the singular privilege and right to affirm their intuitions, impressions … visions … as well as their physical senses during experimental practice. This being the case, this being the approved scientific consortium of the day, several remarkable scientific expansions occurred.
The lifting of sense bans by academicians effectively increasing and extending scientific perception beyond the quantitative bounds, early Victorian Scientists began re-establishing lost connections in their own subjective experience. In this climate, a new re-awakening brought fresh perspective on lost scientific foundations. Reichenbach, a notable professional of the highest scientific calibre, sought understanding of quasi-metaphysical realities. His quest led to the realization that semi-sensate experiences were actually based on a previously well-known energy and energetic stratum which he termed “Odyll”, or “Od”.
While his investigations carefully noted the wonderful luminescent phenomena associated with matter in general, Baron von Reichenbach had yet not penetrated the lost and more archane science sufficiently to recognize the true and Absolute Foundation. Science of his day scarcely recognized what he had achieved, let alone permit him the courtesy of beginning with better foundations.
Had Baron von Reichenbach begun on more ancient foundations he would have realized that even Odyll is a manifestation of a far deeper and more structured reality. Etherists make vague attempts at explaining the appearance and sustenance of forms by etheric formative influence. This contradiction has not previously been corrected.
Ether and Odyll are both gaseous emanations, incapable of forming or sustaining anything beyond a roiling chaos. Therefore, we must divest ourselves of all etheric notions when reality, experience, and perception are to be considered. If the ether were not a permeating atmosphere, it would have destroyed all the forms which presently exist. No then. There must be a far more fundamental substratum .. . an infrastructure .. . of superlative and distinct quality. The answer was (found in subjective experience itself. The innermost intuitions, ideations, impressions~ emotions, visions, and revelations proceed from a foundation which is Absolute and Ancient Perception must include these as well as the five senses, seeing that all of these experiences constitute the human experience. No one of these is to be rejected in constructing a more “academically approved” science. Therefore, experience is taken as a whole, not leaving out any of the experience. Observation must necessarily include ALL of subjective experience … or none of what we count in our observations can be truly considered as valid. Quantitative science has established a false criterion by placing arbitrary bounds on “senses permitted” and “senses prohibited”.
Subjective Experience teaches us that space is not a vacuum. Experiential Space is not empty, but is dynamic, active, living, being possessed of creativity. A problem which sense restrictions placed on scientific observers was the erroneous notion of “outside experience” and “inner experience”. Yet another arbitrary quantitative restriction of our normal and full experience in space, there are no such bounds.
What we experience within has actually reached us from without. When we experience dreams, ideations, impressions, or visionary processions, we receive them … from currents in space. These currents are the EIDETIC CURRENTS of which I speak, and which form the basis of my scientific developments. Eidetic currents have been mapped and charted. Ancients called these “les woivres”, the “waverers”. Medieval
geomancers called the eidetic currents by a single term: VRIL.
Eidetic Currents are not gaseous. Eidetic Currents are not particulate in nature. They are wholes, they are solids. Furthermore, our own being is thoroughly rooted in this eidetic threadwork. The human aura is a participatory personal extension of the eidetic world. The aura is thready, not particulate or gaseous. The aura is our being, identity, and perception. The aura permits experience … the communion within the original whole-worlds. This recognition poses severe strain on the quantitative sciences, seeing that a fundamental world-solidity pre-exists all the gaseous manifestations. Eidetic experience represents to us the real and Absolute world reality.
Eidetic experience produces a world view which conforms with ancient natural philosophy, and explains the seemingly inconsistent claims of ancient cosmognomy. All ancient sciences were based on eidetic world experience, describing an absolute foundation of eternal, crystalline and radiant perfection. A new study of the Platonic concept of EIDOLA and subjective perception will reveal an astonishing consistency with our own reiterations.
When I describe reality, I am forced to first consider eidetic world form. How my sense perceptions are distorted and warped by the resistance of inertial space compose the “experiential problem”. Whole eidetic experience reveals worlds glimpsed by a few. It is the aim of eidetic technology to bring such experiences to those whose sensations have been dulled and deadened by excessive inertifications.
Aura is not an emanation lacking form. More precisely, the aura is not a gaseous emanation of ether. Aura is a thready structure having distinct anatomy and composite layers of great definition. Aura is not that diffusive gas which Reichenbach called Odyll. Aura evidences complex patterns which leave distinct traces in sensitive materials.
Auric patterns have been captured in several kinds of photographic processes. Chemical telegraphy, a lost technology, provided some of the sensitive chemical solutions by which VRIL patterns have been preserved. In a series of experiments I have shown that ground entuned VRIL
patterns actually manifest repetitive orders of form throughout the day, week, and month. These prints will be made available in a forthcoming article entitled “Eidography”.
While these photographic prints preserve the patterns made by environmental aura (VRIL), we have the testimony of legendary radionists who captured anatomical horizons with special tuners and projectors (Drown, DeLaWarr). These shadowgraphs indicate that auric patterns,
the physiological infrastructure, actually sustain physiology and physiological states of vitality. Therefore, the aura is a detailed structure whose forms evidence persistence and continuity through time. Gaseous attributes do not apply to this thready, highly defined auric anatomy. Again, we find a discrepancy between atomic and eidic descriptions at these levels of reality.
Quantum physicists study the artificial horizons which represent our own auric interface with inertial space. This arbitrary zone set by quantitative analysts, is a space replete with dynamics which exceed ultra microscopic analysis. Ultra microscopic examinations of matter reveal a “roiling quantum sea” in which patterns emerge and disappear in a statistical neutrality. Quantum descriptions fail to recognize the
greater patterns which emerge in such action horizons: the auric patterns.
Auric patterns translate subjective experience well beyond the mere gaseous froth on which quantum science so fixates its vision. Qualitative experience recognizes that the gaseous froth is a by-product of a more solid reality whose permeating and commanding presence actually cavitates inertial space. What quantum science studies is the ultra microscopic “detritus” which is created all throughout the spaces where
aura permeates inertial space. To study these frothy disturbances at the expense of recognizing the greater permeations is a great frustration.
Emerging signals which are the causative agencies of the “quantum froth” are not composed of particles, being continuous eidetic images. The information contained in these permeating and suffusive images translates percipients into a far deeper space than the quantum sea. Indeed, one recognizes that the quantum sea is actually a by-product of these far deeper EIDETIC foundations.
While it is difficult to begin a formal and complete treatment of my many thoughts in these fascinating areas of research, I will leave this to a future article. I nevertheless leave you …
– Gerry Vassilatos, Staten Island, New York
This article was taken from the Journal of Borderlands Research ~ Volume LVI No 2 Second Quarter 1995
The full Journal Volume can be downloaded here: http://bit.ly/2KijaQ1
A collection of the Journal of Borderlands Research donated by Thomas Joseph Brown can be downloaded here – http://bit.ly/2L5cGWo
Download the Gerry Vassilatos Collection http://bit.ly/2LecJzm