Aether Units : John DePew, Howard Johnson & Walter Russell

This article was sourced from the amazing site :

Jon DePew – Positive & Negative magnetism spin

Jon DePew is an independent researcher whose work is based on the previous work of Ed Leedskalnin (1887-1951) who single-handedly built the enigmatic Coral Castle in Homestead, Florida.

Edward Leedskalnin

The Coral Castle


Leedskalnin had interesting ideas about electromagnetism.

“His thesis is based upon the theory that the metal itself it not the magnet and that the real magnets are circulating in the metal.  These individual north and south pole magnets are particles smaller than atoms or photons and each particle in the substance was an individual magnet by itself.”1

Leedskalnin believed all matter was being acted upon by “individual magnets”.

He said, “Magnets in general are indestructible. For instance you can burn wood and flesh. You can destroy the body, but you cannot destroy the magnets that hold together the body. They go somewhere else. Iron has more magnets than wood, and every different substance has a different number of magnets that hold the substance together.”2

This idea of ‘individual magnets’ sound like Aether units.  They are positive if they spin in one direction, and negative if they spin in another.  The Aether units flow and change, disappearing into the invisible metaphysical time/space and popping back out again into the visible space/time as matter is created and destroyed.


In 2004 DePew discovered what he considered the “Coral Castle Code” which is a hidden blueprint of nature’s two magnetic currents – the base of all structure and creation in our Universe.3

Credit: Jon DePew


“Development or growth in all of nature,” DePew writes, “is by means of magnetic centripetal and centrifugal forces of two individual magnetic currents and the neutral particles of matter.”


As Ed Leedskalnin wrote in his book Magnetic Current, “Today, Yesterdays sunlight are the Neutral particles of matter.”  In other words, photons (from sunlight) become confined within the fields of Earth.  As they confine they either spin clockwise or anticlockwise forming either electrons or positrons.


DePew claims everything created within Nature and the Whole Universe is achieved with only 3 things:

Two individual & flexible Magnetic Spectrum Currents

Neutral particles of matter orbiting a common core

Credit: Jon DePew


The very “elastic magnetic current tentacles” stretch out in vortex motions that form a torus, or double torus-like structure (seen below).

Credit: Jon DePew


DePew tells us, “The vortex motions are throwing out and pulling in North & South individual magnets, the magnets that are lost are instantly replaced.  For all that was lost was gained back instantly. North and South come back to their own kind of magnet pushing its same kind of magnet continuing the orbital movements, rejoining the individual perpetual orbits.

Magnetic energy flows through each and everything here on earth, but each and everything allows different amounts of it and reacts differently due to the interactions and resistance of the magnets which make up that matter.  All matter is held together by atoms and all atoms are held together by two individual magnetic currents.

Two magnetic currents are the fabric of what is holding together everything in our universe including the atoms themselves.  This is what builds and holds an atom into a structure.

The whole magnetic spectrum is vibrating within scales and octaves (balanced nodes) creating sounds/tones in every portion of it.”4

Credit: Jon DePew



Jon DePew’s Magnetic Wheel

DePew designed his own magnetic wheel based off the principles he learned from Ed Leedskalnin.  It creates magnetic flow in vortex fashion all the way around the wheel.  Neither the wheel nor the small bearings get hot as it runs.

His work is somewhat confusing to understand as he does not explain it well.  He believes the two magnetic currents are the only forces in reality.  His ideas parallel the work we are studying in Cosmic Core, although it is oversimplified.

He sees the two opposing yet harmonious pressures in the universe – the inward flowing centripetal force of gravity and the outward flowing centrifugal force of electromagnetic radiation – solely as magnetic forces.

He does not attribute it to the Aether – or Cosmic Force, as Leedskalnin calls it, although he is aiming in the same direction.  When I see ‘magnets’ in his work, I think ‘Aether units’.  When I see ‘two individual magnetic currents’ I think the expansion and contraction forces of Aether.

He seems to recognize that ‘sunlight’ or photons form the [subatomic] particles of matter.  He sees every particle as neutral and only receiving a charge due to being spun by one or the other magnetic currents, creating either a positively charged or negatively charged particle.


Again, he does not explain the science in detail, although he has created a massive amount of brilliant and beautiful graphics illustrating how sacred geometry represents the segmented blueprints of magnetic energies and neutral particles of matter.5

Credit: Jon DePew

Although it is lacking in depth, his work is interesting and does fit into the overall idea being presented in Cosmic Core.  It is another piece to the puzzle – another perspective to consider.



Magnetic Poles & the Torus

We will now take a look at the work of Michael Snyder and Jonathan Frederick from the Department of Engineering and Physics, at Murray State University in Murray, Kentucky.

They investigate and describe a novel technique for the visualization of magnetic fields in their paper, Photonic Dipole Contours of Ferrofluid Hele-Shaw Cell.6


Snyder and Frederick write, “We deduce that magnetically induced photonic band gap arrays similar to electrostatic liquid crystal operation are responsible for the photographed images and seek to mathematically prove the images are of dipole nature.”

They go on to say, “Understanding magnetic fields is important to facilitate magnetic applications in industry, commerce, and space exploration. Electromagnets can move heavy loads of metal. Magnetic materials attached to credit cards allow for fast and accurate business transactions. Magnetic fields are not visible, and therefore often hard to understand or characterize.”


Below is a photograph of a 50.8mm ring magnet with the North Pole facing the camera with different color LEDs around the perimeter of the lens.

They found that “in areas where the north and south poles of the magnet are located, crossing of light paths is seen.  This is contradictory to a simple dipole model.”  They suggest “that the crossing of the lines are related to left-handed and right-handed helicities/polarizations of the light inside the cell.”

In other words, “If any magnetic dipole contains two small loops of current (rather than one), then each end of a magnetic field may contain “intrinsic torque”. Hence any charged particle which moves parallel to that end-plane of torque (or perpendicular to the N-S poles) would naturally experience a curvature of its path. When electric charge is reversed from plus to minus, the particle curves in an opposite direction, just as if local time were reversed.

On the other hand, if any magnetic dipole were to contain only a single current loop, there would be no intrinsic torque at either end. By that model, it seems inexplicable why some charged particle, passing by either end of a magnet in parallel (or perpendicular to N-S poles), would magically decide to “curve” in one direction or another. No Earth physicist can provide a plausible rationale for the Lorentz force in terms of a single current loop. They just formulate many kinds of ad hoc mathematics to describe it.”7


When viewed from and “end-on” perspective, north and south poles of a magnet showed the unexpected appearance of a “doubly twisted torus”.

How could it do this, unless each end of a magnetic field contains intrinsic torque?








Howard R. Johnson (?-2008) American Inventor

The inventor Howard R. Johnson (no relation to the hotel chain and founder Howard Deering Johnson) is connected with more than 30 patents in the field of chemistry and physics and has impressive credentials.  He was no amateur engineer.

He worked on atomic energy projects at Oak Ridge; did magnetics research for Burroughs company; was a scientific consultant to Lukens Steel; helped develop medical electrical products, injection devices, a ceramic muffler, hysteresis brake; non-locking brake materials; anti-skid linings; silencers for small motions…and more.

He published The Secret World of Magnets that shows the typical over-simplification of the magnetic field, showing movement from north pole to south pole.8

The over-simplification of the magnetic field


He then illustrates what the direction of the lines of force really look like.  There are essentially four magnetic poles, not two.  This perfectly aligns with the work of Walter Russell, discussed below.



Howard Johnson measured the 3D fields of many magnets very carefully and rigorously.

He wrote there are two separate “spinning vortices” at the north or south poles.  The lines of force of which a magnetic field consists are the track of the particle.

One of the most amazingly illustrative and thoroughly innovative concepts in the area of magnetic field structure has been the discovery of vortices caused by the path of the particles which make up the lines of force.


Seen in the image below: There are two vortices present at each “pole”.


The vortices are not all the same.  These magnetic vortexes look nearly identical to the illustrations of the Anu from Annie Besant and Charles Leadbeater seen in Article 106.



Howard Johnson’s Amazing Magnet-Powered Motor

Howard Johnson patented a Permanent magnet motor in 1979.

U.S. Patent No. 4,151,431 describes how it is possible to generate motive power, as in a motor, using only the energy contained in the atoms of permanent magnets.9

“The invention is directed to the method of utilizing the unpaired electron spins in ferro magnetic and other materials as a source of magnetic fields for producing power without any electron flow as occurs in normal conductors, and to permanent magnet motors for utilizing this method to produce a power source. In the practice of the invention the unpaired electron spins occurring within permanent magnets are utilized to produce a motive power source solely through the superconducting characteristics of a permanent magnet and the magnetic flux created by the magnets are controlled and concentrated to orient the magnetic forces generated in such a manner to do useful continuous work, such as the displacement of a rotor with respect to a stator. The timing and orientation of magnetic forces at the rotor and stator components produced by permanent magnets to produce a motor is accomplished with the proper geometrical relationship of these components.”


He discovered how to build motors that run without an input of electricity or any other kind of external energy!

He, like Royal Raymond Rife, Professor John Searl, and engineers Roshin and Godin should be famous!


“Howard Johnson refuses to view the “laws” of science as somehow sacred, so doing the unthinkable and succeeding is second nature to him. If a particular law gets in the way, he sees no harm in going around it for a while to see if there’s something on the other side. Johnson explains the persistent opposition he experiences from the established scientific community this way: “Physics is a measurement science and physicists are especially determined to protect the “Law” of Conservation of Energy. Thus the physicists become game wardens who tell us what ‘laws’ we can’t violate.  In this case they don’t even know what the game is. But they are so scared that I and my associates are going to violate some of these laws that they have to get to the pass to head us off!”10


Johnson is the first to admit he doesn’t actually know where the power he has tapped derives.

Surprise, it’s the Aether!

Johnson said, “It took faith to spend time on it.  It took faith to spend money on it.  And it took faith to consider facing the opposition later when I made my work known and faced all the status quo people.”11


Lt. Col. Tom Bearden writes of Johnson’s invention, “Howard employs a two-particle theory of magnetism; i.e., each magnetic flux line is envisioned as having a particle traveling from the north pole to the south pole, and also a particle traveling from the south pole to the north pole. The particles are spinning; the forward-time particle spins in one direction, and the antiparticle spins in the other direction. Howard then slightly separates the two particle flows.  In other words, Johnson splits the flux lines themselves, into two different pieces. When so separated, the component lines are now curls, so their paths curve. The paths of the two “curl particles” are different; one curls in one direction and the other curls in the opposite direction. Further, a predominance of one form of curl particle gives a “time-forward” aspect, while a predominance of the other form of curl particle gives a “time-reversed” aspect. Johnson is thus able to employ a deeper kind of magnetism than the textbooks presently contain.”12

“The dilemma facing Johnson is not really his dilemma but rather that of other scientists who have observed his prototypes. The devices obviously do work. But the textbooks say it shouldn’t work. And all that Johnson is really saying to the scientific community is this: here is a phenomenon which seems to contradict some of our traditional beliefs. For all our sakes let’s not dismiss it outright but take the time to understand the complex forces at work here.”13



Walter Russell

Walter Russell takes a slightly different perspective to explain the same phenomena.

“Nature is engaged in the making of but one form–the cube-sphere–which means the same as though we said female-male of man.

The sphere is the positive centering sun. The cube is the invisible surrounding wave field. All matter is thus divided into positive solids surrounded by negative space.

Credit: Walter Russell


As matter begins its formation into spheres its first shape is disc-like, for it begins as the base of a cone. In a series of efforts which constitute the octave wave, the first disc-like effort gradually prolates until the perfect sphere is formed at wave amplitude. This is the process by means of which “matter emerges from space”.

Credit: Walter Russell


During this process the balance poles which control all matter move gradually toward the pole of rotation. When the sphere is perfected, as it finally is at carbon, the two poles coincide with the pole of rotation and the equator of the perfected sphere is 90 degrees from the wave’s axis. Likewise, the wave field becomes a true cube. Likewise, any element which has reached its true sphere status will crystallize as a true cube. Likewise, any divided pairs of elements which unite as one on wave amplitude–such as sodium and chlorine–will crystallize in the true cube shape of its wave field.

Conversely, as true spheres oblate, the two balancing poles move away from the pole of rotation and toward the wave axis, until depolarization is completed and magnetic poles disappear in the plane of the wave axis. This is the manner in which “space swallows up matter”. 14


Credit: Walter Russell


Science mistakenly calls these curved lines magnetic lines of force.

There are no magnetic lines of force in Nature. These so-called curved lines are the radii of the spheres and spheroids which constitute this radial universe of prolating and oblating matter.”

Furthermore, he writes, “Every orbit is balanced and controlled by four magnetic poles, not two. It has not yet been known that there are four magnetic poles, but a three-dimensional cube-sphere universe would be impossible with only the two north-south poles…they are in a plane of 90-degree from the plane of the positive and negative north and south poles.”15

“Wherever there is motion, there are two magnetic poles to control their contraction into “matter” and another two to control their expansion into “space.”16

This diagram looks extremely similar to Howard Johnson’s 4-axis magnetic poles.  Credit: Walter Russell




We have taken a look at the forces of Aether through the lens of magnetism.  We have seen how Howard Johnson invented a permanent magnet motor that is a perpetual energy machine that draws energy from the Aether.

It is heart-breaking to see he is scarcely remembered in modern times, considering the paradigm-shattering invention he created.

It is my hope that this new science spreads more rapidly in the future so all of humanity can realize, once and for all, that there are far better energy sources to power our society.  This realization can catapult us into a new era of peace, prosperity and abundance for all.

To end this article I will quote again from Walter Russell’s book, A New Concept of the Universe, “The fuel [we are] using is dug from the ground with hard labor, transported with great effort and shoveled into furnaces by the sweat of man’s brow. Man is beginning to use the gravity of Niagara’s and flowing rivers for electric power which he wastes in radiation instead of multiplying its gravity, as Nature multiplies it in this curved radial universe.

These vast power-wasting furnaces, which seem so impressively suggestive of great progress, are but the multiplied flame of primate man. They have glorified man’s primacy but they have not lifted him out of it.

There is still the needless waste of earth’s resources–still the burden of it in the sweat of heavy labor–still the treadmill of it which is the root cause of present day mass revolt.


Knowledge alone will lift the industrial world from such a state of primacy.”

  2. Michell, John, Eccentric Lives and Peculiar Notions: With 56 Illustrations. Adventures Unlimited Press, 1999
  8. ibid.
  10. Science & Mechanics, Spring 1980,
  11. Johnson, Howard R and William P Harrison, The Permanent Magnet Motor, 7 December 1979,
  12. Bearden, Tom, Chasing the Wild Dragon,
  13. Science & Mechanics, Spring 1980,
  14. Russell, Walter, A New Concept of the Universe, The Walter Russell Foundation, 1953
  15. ibid.
  16. ibid.